Limiting lookups by delivery_email to users with "everyone" email
visibility is overly simplistic. We can successfully do these lookups
whenever the requester has the permission to view the real email address
of the user they're looking up.
Earlier, we were sending 'delete_message' event to all active
subscribers of the stream.
We shouldn't send event to those users who don't have access
to the deleted message in a private stream with protected history.
This commit fixes that bug.
Also, now we use 'event_recipient_ids_for_action_on_messages'.
It helps to add hardening such that if the invariant "no usermessage
row corresponding to a message exists if the user loses access to the
message" is violated due to some bug, it has minimal user impact.
Earlier, we used to store the key data related to realm exports
in RealmAuditLog. This commit adds a separate table to store
those data.
It includes the code to migrate the concerned existing data in
RealmAuditLog to RealmExport.
Fixes part of #31201.
These files are necessary for the protocol to verify that the file
upload was completed successfully. Rather than delete them, we update
their StorageClass if it is non-STANDARD.
We create an unnamed user group with just the group creator as it's
member when trying to set the default. The pattern I've followed across
most of the acting_user additions is to just put the user declared
somewhere before the check_add_user_group and see if the test passes.
If it does not, then I'll look at what kind of user it needs to be set
to `acting_user`.
This commit does not add the logic of using this setting to actually
check the permission on the backend. That will be done in a later
commit.
Only owners can modify this setting, but we will add that logic in a
later commit in order to keep changes in this commit minimal.
Adding the setting breaks the frontend, since the frontend tries to find
a dropdown widget for the setting automatically. To avoid this, we've
added a small temporary if statement to `settings_org.js`.
Although, most lists where we insert this setting follow an unofficial
alphabetical order, `can_manage_all_groups` has been bunched together
with `can_create_groups` since keeping those similar settings together
would be nicer when checking any code related to creating/managing a
user group.
We will not remove `user_group_edit_policy` yet. That will be removed
once we have introduced a user group setting to manage edit permissions
to groups.
We might introduce a generic testing function similar to
do_test_changing_settings_by_owners_only later, but not right now, since
there is only 1 setting at the moment needing that test.
This commit does not add the logic of using this setting to actually
check the permission on the backend. That will be done in a later
commit.
Adding the setting breaks the frontend, since the frontend tries to find
a dropdown widget for the setting automatically. To avoid this, we've
added a small temporary if statement to `settings_org.js`.
The error response when a user group cannot be deactivated due
to it being used as a subgroup or for a setting includes details
about the supergroups, streams, user groups as well the settings
for which it is used.
Previously, if the user_group_edit_policy was set to allow
members or full members to manage the group, the user had
to be the direct member of the group being managed.
This commit updates the code to allow members of the subgroups
as well to manage the group as technically members of the
subgroups are member of the group.
This also improves the code to not fetch all the group members
to check this, and instead directly call is_user_in_group
which uses "exists" to check it.
This commit renames has_user_group_access function to
has_user_group_access_for_subgroup, since the function
is only used to check access for using a group as subgroup.
This commit refactors the code to check permission for
accessing user group in such a way that we can avoid
duplicate code in future when we will have different
settings controlling the permissions for editing group
details and settings, joining the group, adding others
to group, etc.
Replaces links to "Getting your organization started with Zulip"
in onboarding emails and Welcome bot direct message for owners of
new organizations.
Revises text in those emails and messages to reflect the new
"Moving to Zulip" help center guide that is now used.
In order to only generate relative links for Zulip Cloud billing
specific gear menu options in relevant help center articles, we
pass down settings.CORPORATE_ENABLED to be set as a global variable
for zerver/lib/markdown/help_relative_links.py so that self-hosted
servers' help center documentation will not have these links.
The Content-Type, Content-Disposition, StorageClass, and general
metadata are not set according to our patterns by tusd; copy the file
to itself to update those properties.
Setting `ResponseContentDisposition=attachment` means that we override
the stored `ContentDisposition`, which includes a filename. This
means that using the "Download" link on servers with S3 storage
produced a file named the sanitized version we stored.
Explicitly build a `ContentDisposition` to tell S3 to return, which
includes both `attachment` as well as the filename (if we have it
locally).
Apparently, Outlook ignores height/width CSS rules, but does support
the attribute on the image element itself, so specify that instead.
I don't think there are likely to be image tag implementations that
don't support the attribute, given that's the only thing that works in
Outlook.
This test was written back when Django accepted view function names as
strings that might be wrong; that’s not possible in Django ≥ 1.10.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
For exporting full with consent:
* Earlier, a message advertising users to react with thumbs up
was sent and later used to determine the users who consented.
* Now, we no longer need to send such a message. This commit
updates the logic to use `allow_private_data_export` user-setting
to determine users who consented.
Fixes part of #31201.
This commit adds test coverage for the
'if user_profile.realm != message.get_realm():' block in
'set_visibility_policy_possible' function.
Currently, 'test_command_with_consented_message_id' adds the
test coverage for this code block. But we plan to remove that
test in the next commit as a part of removing 'react on consent
message' approach.
So, this commit explicitly adds code for the test coverage of
the concerned code block.
This new property allows organization administrators to specify whether
users can modify the custom profile field value on their own account.
This property is configurable for individual fields.
By default, existing and newly created fields have this property set to
true, that is, they allow users to edit the value of the fields.
Fixes part of #22883.
Co-Authored-By: Ujjawal Modi <umodi2003@gmail.com>
This allows finer-grained access control and auditing. The links
generated also expire after one week, and the suggested configuration
is that the underlying data does as well.
Co-authored-by: Prakhar Pratyush <prakhar@zulip.com>
This commit renames the 'send_event' function to
'send_event_rollback_unsafe' to reflect the fact that it doesn't
wait for the db transaction (within which it gets called, if any)
to commit and sends event irrespective of commit or rollback.
In most of the cases we don't want to send event in the case of
rollbacks, so the caller should be aware that calling the function
directly is rollback unsafe.
Adds a check for changing an existing guest user's role before
calling do_update_user in the case that a realm has a current
paid plan with manual license management.
In addition to checking for available licenses in the current
billing period when adding or inviting new non-guest users, for
manual billing, we also verify that the number of licenses set
for the next billing period will be enough when adding/inviting
new users.
Realms that are exempt from license number checks do not have
this restriction applied.
Admins are notified via group direct message when a user fails
to register due to this restriction.
Aside of what's generally explained in the code comment, this is
motivated by the specific situation of import of Slack Connect channels.
These channels contain users who are "external collaborators" and
limited to a single channel in Slack. We don't have more sophisticated
handling of their import, which would map this concept 1-to-1 in Zulip -
but we create them as inactive dummy users, meaning they have to go
through signup before their account is usable.
The issue is that their imported UserProfile.role is set to Member and
when they register, the UserProfile gets reactivated with that role
unchanged. However, if e.g. the user is signing up after they received
an invitation from the admin, they should get the role that was
configured on the invite. In particular important if the user is meant
to still be "limited" and thus the admin invites them as a guest - they
definitely don't want the user to get a full Member account because of
this weird interaction between import and registration.
Currently, it handles two hook types: 'pre-create' (to verify that the
user is authenticated and the file size is within the limit) and
'pre-finish' (which creates an attachment row).
No secret is shared between Django and tusd for authentication of the
hooks endpoints, because none is necessary -- tusd forwards the
end-user's credentials, and the hook checks them like it would any
end-user request. An end-user gaining access to the endpoint would be
able to do no more harm than via tusd or the normal file upload API.
Regardless, the previous commit has restricted access to the endpoint
at the nginx layer.
Co-authored-by: Brijmohan Siyag <brijsiyag@gmail.com>
