This causes avatars and emoji which are hosted by Zulip in S3 (or
compatible) servers to no longer go through camo. Routing these
requests through camo does not add any privacy benefit (as the request
logs there go to the Zulip admins regardless), and may break emoji
imported from Slack before 1bf385e35f,
which have `application/octet-stream` as their stored Content-Type.
Earlier, the notification-blocking for messages from muted senders
was a side-effect of we never sending notifications for messages
with the "read" flag.
This commit decouples these two things, as a prep for having new
settings which will allow users to **always** receive email
notifications, including when/if they read the message during the
time the notifications is in the queue.
We still mark muted-sender messages as "read" when they are sent,
because that's desirable anyways.
Fixes#17277.
The main limitation of this implementation is that the sync happens if
the user authing already exists. This means that a new user going
through the sign up flow will not have their custom fields synced upon
finishing it. The fields will get synced on their consecutive log in via
SAML in the future. This can be addressed in the future by moving the
syncing code further down the codepaths to login_or_register_remote_user
and plumbing the data through to the user creation process.
We detail that limitation in the documentation.
The `message_id` and `user_profile_id` values don't really matter for
our testing here, so we might as well set these dummy values in the
main function.
Rename poll_timeout to event_queue_longpoll_timeout_seconds
and change its value from 90000 ms to 90 sec. Expose its
value in register api response when realm data is fetched.
Bump API_FEATURE_LEVEL to 74.
Shift functions used for compatibility from
zerver.lib.home (is_outdated_server) and
zerver.view.compatibility (pop_numerals,
version_lt, find_mobile_os,
is_outdated_desktop_app, is_unsupported_browser)
to zerver.lib.compatibility module.
This locks the message row while a reaction is being added/removed,
which will handle race conditions caused by deleting the message
at the same time.
We make sure that events work happens outside the transaction,
so that in case there's some problem with the queue processor, the
locks aren't held for too long.
As a nice side-effect, we also handle race conditions from double
adding reactions, because once the message is locked, a duplicate
request will wait till the earlier transaction commits, and hence
will not throw `IntegrityErrors`s (rather, will be handled in our
safety check in the /views code itself), which earlier had to be
handled explicitly.
This locks the message while creating a submessage, which
will handle race conditions caused by deleting the message
simultaneously.
We make sure that events work happens outside the transaction,
so that in case there's a problem with the queue processor,
the locks aren't held for too long.
Further commits will start locking the message rows while
adding related fields like reactions or submessages,
to handle races caused by deleting the message itself at the
same time.
The message locking implemented then will create a possibility
of deadlocks, where the related field transaction holds a lock
on the message row, and the message-delete transaction holds a
lock on the database row of the related field (which will also
need to be deleted when the message is deleted), and both
transactions wait for each other.
To prevent such a deadlock, we lock the message itself while
it is being deleted, so that the message-delete transaction
will have to wait till the other transaction (which is about
to delete the related field, and also holds a lock on the
message row) commits.
https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/near/1185943 has more details.
Further commits will hook some `send_event` calls to `on_commit`.
With those changes, these will never be executed in tests, because
transactions never get commited with `TestCase`, which the
`ZulipTestCase` is a subclass of.
We want to make sure that these events are actually sent for testing
purposes, hence this change.
There's no need to actually capture the callbacks, because the
events are already thoroughly tested.
This commit fixes a bug where moving messages between streams was
not allowed for non-admins when allow_community_topic_editing was
set to false and move_messages_between_streams_policy was set to
Realm.POLICY_MEMBERS_ONLY.
The bug is fixed by calling can_edit_content_or_topic only when
topic or content edit is there and not in the case where only
message is moved from one stream to another.
Soon, each endpoint won't necessarily have a .md
file, but would generate API doc directly from
OpenAPI data using a template.
So, the lists of endpoints to be tested should not
be taken from the .md files, but from the REST
endpoints available in the sidebar.
This commit also adds a missing test for an invalid
article being accessed in the URL of an API page.
This should help with #17425, where messages with lots of LaTeX are
lost, due to the large expansion factor.
This isn't a total fix for this - large messages with lots of LaTeX
can still end up larger than 1MB, and rendering could timeout, but
this fix should help significantly.
1MB is still small enough that I don't expect we'll run into any DOS
problems - my testing didn't show any problems rendering messages that
contain ~1MB of LaTeX.
This will offer users who are self-hosting to adjust
this value. Moreover, this will help to reduce the
overall time taken to test `test_markdown.py` (since
this can be now overridden with `override_settings`
Django decorator).
This is done as a prep commit for #18641.
Checked the email looked OK in `/emails` for both creating realm and
registering within an existing one.
Not sure zerver/tests/test_i18n.py test has been suppressed correctly.
Fixes#17786.
This is a bit hacky, but will make these tests more readable,
in that the reader would not have to remember the order or parameter
names.
Python 3.8 introduced `mock.call_args.kwargs`, and once we upgrade,
we can use those to assert actual dictionaries instead of this hack.
d66cbd2832 added these mentioning
"always_notify" for some reason, but always_notify clearly isn't a real
thing in this context so the comments need to be fixed to eliminate this
potential source of confusion.
These checks are more related to the API than the editability
or permissions logic, so it makes sense to handle them first
before further processing the request.
Also split the main test class to separate out the tests for
this logic.
This also simplifies some tests by reducing the data setup
required to reach failure.
Tweaked by tabbott to avoid losing the topic_name.strip().
